ubikcan

February 26, 2007

Imperial cartography

Filed under: cartography, politics — ubikcan @ 10:38 am

Back to serious posting.

As I noted last summer, one of the interesting constructions of the “geography of terror” is found in Thomas Barnett’s book The Pentagon’s New Map. As I noted:

Barnett characterizes the world into two zones; the good or the “functioning core” and the bad or the “Non-integrating gap.” This is an update on Mackinder, or Mackinder-lite you could say, and reflects the old core-periphery models of high school geography in the 1950s cold war.

Now Simon Dalby, a professor of geography and political economy at Carleton University, has written his own critique of that cartography in Gregory and Pred’s new book Violent Geographies (Table of contents here).

Since Barnett maintains his own blog and recently had a run-in with a posting on Daily Kos, perhaps Barnett would care to respond to this chapter?

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: