Among the items found at gravesites in Fort Morgan’s Riverside Cemetery have been beer, cigarettes and — sheep?
Toy and stuffed sheep are frequently placed at the tombstone of Philip K. Dick, who was buried at Riverside in spite of his family’s wishes because he wanted to be interred next to his twin sister, who died in Fort Morgan in infancy.
The sheep are a homage to Dick’s story, “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” which became the movie “Blade Runner,” Fort Morgan Museum educator Andrew Dunehoo told several groups of area residents during tours of the cemetery Saturday.
Several of Dick’s stories became motion pictures, among them “We Can Dream It For You Wholesale,” which was developed into “Total Recall,” “Minority Report” and “A Scanner Darkly.”
Fans of Dick sometimes leave pens at his graveside, a nod to his writing vocation.
Ugh, my nerves will be shredded! No beach ball jokes plz.
I’m somewhat confused by the time change as the US doesn’t change for another week (thanks Bush!) but Europe, ahead as always, changes tonight. Oh well, I’ll tune in early just in case!
Glenn Greenwald is right to point to this piece of House drama (or what passes for drama there). If you don’t like politics skip pressing play here, but if you like, not polemics, but a serious point dramatically made, then watch it:
As Glenn and many of the commenters (on his site and at YouTube) point out, this is a small lesson in the Constitution, and also kinda funny and inspiring at the same time. Inspiring because I’ll feel like doing that at the next work-meeting when someone is being ignorant!
However. Behind all this is a more substantial and less recognized problem. Namely are our laws (inc. the Constitution) “sufficient” or are they always at the last fated to be overturned due to “special circumstances” (“national security,” “the war”) or what to get fancy one much-adored Italian philosopher has called a “permanent state of exception”?
Glenn often appeals to the law–as it exists–in the face of those times when it is being overridden, eg FISA, PATRIOT ACT, government surveillance without a warrant, etc. Notice that this is a case of the law as it exists, not a case of oh, we should change the law for the better. Glenn’s position (and I’ve been reading him since he first appeared with his own website in late 2005) is basically that actually existing laws–including the Constitution again–are circumvented in the name of national security.
If laws are fated to be overturned, then the conclusion we are faced with is that legal formations of rule are insufficient: law, itself, is not the solution to the way a country will be ruled. America calls itself a nation of law, but think about that for a moment: how can it be if at the last, law runs out or is trumped by the state of exception? What would it mean? It would mean that you can’t appeal to the law (as Glenn does) to do the right thing.
Now I’m not a big fan of Agamben (the fancy Italian philosopher afore-referenced) but I’m beginning to wonder, as much as I admire, Glenn Greenwald, whether he isn’t just a bit naive on all this in appealing to the law and the constitution.
The New Staggers has a nice review of what must be a UK re-issue of the Man in the High Castle:
Even so, his fictions are powerfully thought-stirring. Like Borges and Calvino, Dick uses fiction to do more than portray the all-too-familiar ambivalences of human emotions. More ambitiously, he is challenging the ideas by which we interpret our experience. We think we are embodied minds, which conceive and execute plans of action; we believe our lives reflect these plans. We imagine that the theories we frame about the world are not only useful, but also true. These highly questionable suppositions are Dick’s subject matter, and in freeing us from the false certainty that goes with the ruling view of things, he is one of the most liberating writers of the 20th century.
Luckily the review, by John Gray, restrains itself to only the one reference to drugs (“A highly strung character whose tensions were aggravated by prodigious drug consumption”) and usefully reminds us that sf is about the present:
The critical disparagement of Dick’s work has various sources, not least that of literary disdain for science fiction. Seeing the genre as being concerned with possible futures and imaginary worlds, these critics miss the central thrust of the best SF, which is to reimagine the world we live in. H G Wells, Olaf Stapledon, Stanislaw Lem and J G Ballard enable us to see ourselves differently, and this is what places them among the greatest modern writers.
How well does your state do in providing health care? Georgia ranks a pitiful 38th out of 51 (all states plus DC). But hey, that’s up from 44th! Yay!
One observation: this “opt out” that’s being discussed, whereby states can opt out of health care reform. Notice the worst states are in the South (darker = worse care). If they opt out, as would seem more likely, then people there will be hit twice over; they already have bad care, and the conservative leadership there (supported by Blue Dogs) will prevent them from getting better care.